<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Iowa?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/</link>
	<description>Neil Kramer is a writer in Los Angeles.  Citizen of the Month is his blog.  Make yourself at home.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Whit</title>
		<link>http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218451</link>
		<dc:creator>Whit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218451</guid>
		<description>Do you need a running mate?  FYI, I've never shot anyone in the face.

With a gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you need a running mate?  FYI, I&#8217;ve never shot anyone in the face.</p>
<p>With a gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218450</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218450</guid>
		<description>I'm waiting for the inappropriate "caucus vs. cock-us" jokes... I'm so disappointed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for the inappropriate &#8220;caucus vs. cock-us&#8221; jokes&#8230; I&#8217;m so disappointed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cruisin-mom</title>
		<link>http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218449</link>
		<dc:creator>cruisin-mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218449</guid>
		<description>Neil, you're hysterical. But in answer to your question...it's not that these states will decide (and can you please tell me how it is that Iowa picks Huckabee and Obama at the same time?)it's that CNN and MSNBC and FOX NEWS all need something to fill 24 hours with. So they make a big deal about what Iowa has to say. I mean, it can't be Britney all the time, now can it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, you&#8217;re hysterical. But in answer to your question&#8230;it&#8217;s not that these states will decide (and can you please tell me how it is that Iowa picks Huckabee and Obama at the same time?)it&#8217;s that CNN and MSNBC and FOX NEWS all need something to fill 24 hours with. So they make a big deal about what Iowa has to say. I mean, it can&#8217;t be Britney all the time, now can it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave G</title>
		<link>http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218448</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218448</guid>
		<description>What's interesting is the primaries used to be completely irrelevant and the nominee was selected at the national convention (i.e. in a smoky dark room). Somewhere along the way, the two reversed and the primaries now determine the nominee and the national convention is just a bunch of speeches and hype. 

I agree with you that having two of the nation's smallest (and whitest) states determine the national nominee is bogus. But as a former NH resident, I will tell you, it's fun. I saw Al Gore speak way back in 1988 when he first ran for president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s interesting is the primaries used to be completely irrelevant and the nominee was selected at the national convention (i.e. in a smoky dark room). Somewhere along the way, the two reversed and the primaries now determine the nominee and the national convention is just a bunch of speeches and hype. </p>
<p>I agree with you that having two of the nation&#8217;s smallest (and whitest) states determine the national nominee is bogus. But as a former NH resident, I will tell you, it&#8217;s fun. I saw Al Gore speak way back in 1988 when he first ran for president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218445</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218445</guid>
		<description>I hope we don't see Hillary and Bill in this kind of shot anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope we don&#8217;t see Hillary and Bill in this kind of shot anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyJoe</title>
		<link>http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218444</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyJoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218444</guid>
		<description>Your man in New Hampshire:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your man in New Hampshire:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churlita</title>
		<link>http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218443</link>
		<dc:creator>churlita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizenofthemonth.com/2008/01/08/why-iowa/#comment-218443</guid>
		<description>Ha ha. I totally voted for you in the caucuses. You were the most viable blogger candidate there. I'm so glad you won all the delegates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha. I totally voted for you in the caucuses. You were the most viable blogger candidate there. I&#8217;m so glad you won all the delegates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
