Comments on: Jennifer Love Hewitt and the Los Angeles Times Ad

By: Michael

Michael — Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:03:54 +0000

Oh,everybody knows,a ass says more than thousend words
Michael posted Brazil Wins Group B U17 FIFA CONMEBOL Tournament

By: Unknown

Unknown — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:51:29 +0000

She is so beautiful! She has a beautiful face! Very beautiful eyes and fantastic smile! She had also a nice body! But now she lost her sexy body! Now his ass is wider than his shoulders! A very beautiful face with an ugly body!

By: Kathy

Kathy — Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:14:53 +0000

That’s an unflattering angle for anyone, size 2 and beyond. And it’s totally normal for women to have cellulite. I’m small, and my thighs still dimple. It’s called having a woman’s body.

By: ...deb

...deb — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:25:12 +0000

I love you, man.

By: Christopha!

Christopha! — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:14:32 +0000

That broad, JLH, has a great ass, and I mean that in the most respectful way ‘broad with a great ass’ can be conveyed. Guys who like girls built like 10 year old boys probably don’t like girls.

By: Ash

Ash — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:04:12 +0000

Neil, you are welcome to come and hold my ass any time you like

By: Kyra

Kyra — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:27:39 +0000

I don’t understand why anyone cares about what she looks like on vacation from that angle anyway. Real women are varied in a million different ways, why is that such a bad thing?

Kudos Neil (and a HUGE thank-you for the art fair, I just paid for Christmas!)

By: brettdl

brettdl — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:43:03 +0000

I must be getting old; I’m more interested in the advertising rant issue. Perhaps it’s because I’m considering advertising on my site.

Here’s my problem: If the Los Angeles Times didn’t take advertising, it simply wouldn’t exist. The same is true of most major publications.

That’s because publishers have long known that customers will not pay fair value for the reporting, editing and production that goes into a newspaper.

Americans cancel subscriptions over 5 cent increases for goodness sakes. Can you imagine what a daily newspaper would cost today if the price kept up with inflation over the last 100 years?

No one wants to pay for content – even me. I’ve been reading papers online since the mid-1990s.

But at the moment, the only known way to offset the cost of production is advertising. Moving to the Internet does not solve this problem.

Reporters need health benefits and enough cash to feed their kids. Publishers have to pay for hardware, software, hosting, bandwidth, etc. If free websites don’t offer advertising to raise funding, how else will the information cycle continue?

On the other hand, I dislike certain kinds of ads as much as you do. I would have freaked seeing a Burger King ad on my site since I regularly blast fast food. The problem with the advertising network you mentioned is no control over ad content.

But these ad networks are poised to replace the mishmash of advertising sites out there right now. Why? Because advertisers can’t keep going go to 500 blogs to place one ad. Instead, they want to buy from one or two sources.

I don’t know what the solution is. If I find it, I’ll invite you to my new house in Santa Barbara.

By: mrs mogul

mrs mogul — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:09:24 +0000

wow, I didn’t know Neil’s penis read this! Yeah she’s a bloater! LOL Nah,really that’s not really her, it’s TYRA!

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:06:28 +0000

I know MY ass doesn’t look that good! I felt the same way when people were making fun of Brittney Spears at the MTV thingy….ok, maybe it wasn’t the best thing for HER image to show up on live television less than toned, but she still looks a hell of a lot better than me. It’s a great world when my 95 pound twelve year old daughter thinks she’s fat because she doesn’t look like Twiggy.