next they’ll have Hooters girls leering into the camera ‘hi, I’m Becky and I have a PHD in alternative medicines’ ‘helloooo, I am Susie and I have a degree in chemical biology’…’enroll now and you too can be rubbing shoulders with these students’

By The Moviequill on 08.09.05 5:40 am

What’s the required reading material … Playboy?

By Josia on 08.09.05 6:05 am

I’ll tutor her.

~Jef

By Jef on 08.09.05 6:17 am

What, a stinky $100 for a Libertarian Looker? 3 hrs at a day spa cost me more!

By Tatyana on 08.09.05 6:23 am

Christ.

By ashbloem on 08.09.05 6:42 am

I don’t get it. Stanford University is using hookers who are afraid to question their own government to lure unsuspecting teens into to forking over their parents’ money for an expensive education that won’t help them get a job? I’m outraged! Why didn’t they do this when I was choosing a school?

By JJ MacMillan on 08.09.05 6:42 am

Well I know the rich don’t eat babies, duh, but can my girlfriend still apply if she thinks they eat fetuses?

By a.m. griff on 08.09.05 6:52 am

Continuing Education continues it’s decline. I blame the right, I don’t know about you.

By cannot be trusted on 08.09.05 7:29 am

I would love to sit down with that girl (post coital, of course) and quiz her on her conservative beliefs. I’m betting her every response ends with “or, you know, whatever…”

By JJ MacMillan on 08.09.05 8:16 am

Neil, I think you might have gotten your liberal ass suckered. I really don’t think this ad is real… But it’s funny anyway.

By Sophia on 08.09.05 9:11 am

Sure, she’s hot. But what if your in the middle of “it” and she starts talking about how she supports the war in Iraq…oh maybe that’s only a lesbian issue…

By jenny on 08.09.05 9:29 am

Hmmm, yeah, Sophia, the eating babies comment kind of pushes the envelope. Although Bush is Hitler, isn’t he?

By Edgy Mama on 08.09.05 10:05 am

I think that Sophia is right. This ad is a bit weird…is the model Ann Coulter vers. 2.0?

By M.A. on 08.09.05 11:06 am

We’re both sort of right, Neil. This ad was indeed published by the conservative Stanford Review, but it was supposed to be “half-serious, half-joke” by the editor-in-chief’s own admission.

“It’s half-serious, half-joke — the reward is real, but the funny part is, conservatives don’t actually use terms like ‘marginalized minority,’” Cohen said. “It’s a serious contest, though — I’m not spending three hundred dollars on nothing.”

Of course, many liberals jumped on it, calling it sexist and in poor taste.

Here’s the link:

http://www.stanforddaily.com/tempo?page=content&id=13455&repository=0001_article

By Sophia on 08.09.05 1:59 pm

You have got to be fucking kidding me.

As an intelligent and sexy bitch, I am offended. Why exactly I’m not sure, but dammit, I am.

Maybe because it says she’s conservative….

By introspectre on 08.09.05 3:18 pm